Math // Ratio & Proportion

Ratio Problems

Solve problems involving the relative sizes of two quantities where missing values can be found by using integer multiplication and division facts

Ages
10 to 11
Type
Method
Builds on
4 topics
Leads to
3 topics
Standards
1 code

Quick check

If a recipe uses 3 eggs for every 200g of flour, can the learner work out how many eggs would be needed for 600g of flour?

Ask this to see whether the topic is secure.

Topic // Mastery

What mastery looks like

What a learner can do once this topic is secure.
  • If the ratio of red to blue beads is 3:5 and there are 15 blue beads, find the number of red beads
  • Use multiplication facts to find the missing value: 'For every 2 apples there are 5 oranges; if there are 20 oranges, how many apples?'
  • Explain the multiplicative relationship between two quantities in a ratio context

Topic // Map

Where this fits

What to learn first and what this topic opens up, with the reason for each link. Required links come first.
  • RequiredMust come first
  • HelpfulHelps, but not essential

Before this

4 topics
  • Multiplication & Division // Ages 9 to 10

    Ratio reasoning builds on multiplicative comparison from Y5

  • Ratio & Proportion // Ages 9 to 11

    Solving relative sizes problems requires 'ratio', 'proportion', and 'relative size' as understood terms

  • Ratio & Proportion // Ages 9 to 12

    Solving relative-sizes problems is most reliably scaffolded by drawing a bar model to set up the relationship

  • Fractions // Ages 10 to 11

    Ratio reasoning connects to fraction multiplication

You are here

Ratio Problems

Ages 10 to 11 // Method

Leads to

3 topics
  • Ratio & Proportion // Ages 10 to 11

    Scale factor problems are a specific application of ratio/proportion

  • Ratio & Proportion // Ages 10 to 11

    Unequal sharing is ratio reasoning in context

  • Algebra // Ages 10 to 11

    Relationships between corresponding terms connect to proportional reasoning

Topic // Research-informed

Teaching notes

From the Marble Skill Taxonomy. These notes have not been validated in classrooms, so treat them as a starting point for your own judgement.

The approach

Learners solve missing-value ratio problems (given a ratio and one known quantity, find the other) by finding and applying a constant multiplier, e.g. 'red:blue is 3:5, there are 15 blue — find red' (15÷5=3, so ×3, red = 3×3 = 9). The central challenge is overcoming ADDITIVE reasoning — 'blue rose by 10, so red rises by 10' or 'keep the same difference' — by making the multiplicative relationship visible through bar models, ratio tables and 'for every' language, and by letting learners see that adding the same amount to both unequal parts changes the relationship while multiplying both parts by the same factor preserves it.

Common misconceptions

  • Additive/constant-difference reasoning: 'blue rose by 10, so red rises by 10' (or 'the difference is 2, keep it') instead of scaling by a constant multiplier
  • Applies the multiplier to only one quantity, or adds the multiplier instead of multiplying
  • Uses the wrong direction (multiplies when should divide to find the multiplier, or vice versa)
  • Build-up strategy that works for whole-number cases but collapses when the multiplier is non-integer

Useful representations

  • Bar model with equal blocks per part (find one block = the share/multiplier)
  • Ratio table showing the constant multiplier down the columns (3:5, ×3 → 9:15)
  • Double number line aligning the two quantities at 0
  • 'For every a there are b' grouping with counters/cubes
  • Arrow diagram showing '×3' mapping ratio to real amounts

Teaching practices

  • Draw a bar model first: equal blocks for each part make 'find one block' (the multiplier/share value) the obvious pivot, and expose the structure before any arithmetic.
  • Name the multiplier explicitly: 'what do we multiply the ratio by to get the real amounts?' (15 = 5 × 3, so ×3 everywhere) — this directly counters additive thinking.
  • Use a ratio table so equivalent ratios (3:5, 6:10, 9:15) are seen as scalings of the same relationship, and the constant multiplier is visible down the columns.
  • Confront the additive error head-on with a comparison task: show that 'add 10 to both' changes the relationship (3:5 vs 13:15 are different mixtures) whereas multiplying keeps it — ideally with a concrete mixing/colour context where the change is perceptible.
  • Keep 'for every' language central ('for every 3 red there are 5 blue') so scaling up in whole groups feels natural before formal multiplier work.
  • Vary which quantity is known and use non-unit and non-integer multipliers so children cannot rely on simple build-up alone.

Activities to try

  1. 1

    Scale a mixture and compare adding versus multiplying

    Why it works: The two quantities in a ratio are linked by a constant multiplier, not a constant difference: scaling both parts by the same factor preserves the relationship, while adding the same amount to both breaks it whenever the two parts are unequal.

    1. Meet the problem 'red:blue is 3:5 and there are 15 blue — how many red?' alongside a visible outcome such as rows of beads or a paint shade produced by the ratio.
    2. Scale the ratio up a ratio table (3:5, 6:10, 9:15) and watch two bars (one per part) grow together, stating the multiplier that turns 5 into 15 (×3) and applying the same ×3 to red to get 9.
    3. Try two contrasting moves on the mixture: 'add 10 to each part' (giving 13:15) and 'multiply each part by 3' (giving 9:15), and observe which move keeps the mixture/shade the same and which changes it.
    4. Say in words why multiplying by 3 keeps the same relationship but adding 10 to both does not.
    5. As an optional extension beyond the integer-fact objective, keep red:blue 3:5 but switch to a measurable paint mixture: with 12 ml blue the multiplier is 12÷5 = 2.4, so red = 3×2.4 = 7.2 ml. This shows that building up in whole groups of 3:5 cannot reach the answer. (A bead count could not be 7.2, so use continuous amounts here.)
  2. 2

    Build a bar model to find one share

    Why it works: Finding the value of a single equal 'share' or block reveals the constant multiplier and makes the equal-grouping structure of a ratio explicit before any symbolic arithmetic.

    1. Draw a bar model with equal blocks for each part of the ratio (3 blocks red, 5 blocks blue).
    2. Match the known quantity to its blocks and work out the value of one block (15 blue ÷ 5 blocks = 3 per block).
    3. Multiply the value of one block by the number of blocks in the unknown part (3 × 3 = 9 red).
    4. Explain, pointing at the model, why the red count is that number because every block holds the same amount.
  3. 3

    Solve varied missing-value problems and catch the additive trap

    Why it works: The same constant multiplier applies to both parts regardless of which quantity is known, and multiplicative reasoning works even when the multiplier is not a whole number — unlike repeated adding.

    1. Solve a set of missing-value problems where the known quantity varies between the two parts and multipliers are sometimes non-integer, e.g. 'for every 2 apples there are 5 oranges; with 20 oranges, how many apples?' (×4 → 8 apples).
    2. For each, state the multiplier and show it applied to both parts.
    3. Compare a tempting additive answer with the correct scaled answer and explain which relationship each uses, e.g. for 2 apples : 5 oranges with 20 oranges, the additive move gives 2+15 = 17 while the correct scaled answer is 2×4 = 8.
    4. As an optional extension, tackle one non-integer case using measurable quantities (e.g. 2 cups juice : 5 cups water with 12 cups water → ×2.4 → 4.8 cups juice) to test that the method still works when whole-group build-up cannot reach the number.

Topic // Standards

Curriculum standards

Codes for the curriculum statements this topic maps to. Each publisher owns its standard text.
The national curriculum in England: Key stages 1 and 2 framework document
Ma6/2.4a

Math // Ratio & Proportion