Science // Space Exploration
Journey to Mars
Evaluate the engineering and human challenges of long-duration spaceflight to Mars — radiation exposure, muscle and bone loss, psychological isolation, communication delays — and assess the current state of the SETI programme: what methods are used, what has been detected so far, and what the Fermi Paradox is
Quick check
If the learner was asked whether they'd volunteer for a 3-year mission to Mars, could they describe at least three serious scientific or engineering challenges that would need to be solved first — and explain why the 20-minute communication delay alone changes almost everything about how the mission would operate?
Ask this to see whether the topic is secure.
Topic // Mastery
What mastery looks like
- Identifies and explains at least three major challenges of a Mars mission: radiation (no magnetosphere), bone/muscle loss from low gravity, psychological isolation, and delayed communications
- Describes how SETI searches for intelligent life (radio signals, laser pulses, technosignatures) and explains why the lack of detection so far is not proof of absence
- States the Fermi Paradox ('Where is everybody?') and discusses two contrasting proposed resolutions
Topic // Map
Where this fits
- RequiredMust come first
- HelpfulHelps, but not essential
Before this
2 topics- Space Exploration MilestonesRequired
Space Exploration // Ages 9 to 11
Evaluating Mars mission challenges depends on knowing key milestones in human space exploration
- Galaxies and the universeHelpful
Space Systems & Earth's History // Ages 12 to 13
Mars/SETI/Fermi paradox analysis depends on understanding the scale of the universe
You are here
Journey to Mars
Ages 13 to 14 // Thinking skill
Leads to
0 topicsNothing in the catalogue builds on this topic yet. Browse Space Exploration
Topic // Research-informed
Teaching notes
From the Marble Skill Taxonomy. These notes have not been validated in classrooms, so treat them as a starting point for your own judgement.
The approach
A META/evaluation topic for ages 13-14: weigh the challenges of a crewed Mars mission and reason about whether we are alone (SETI and the Fermi Paradox). The skill is structured evaluation of open problems under uncertainty — marshalling evidence, weighing trade-offs and defending a position rather than finding a single right answer. Organise Mars challenges with NASA's RIDGE framework (Radiation, Isolation/confinement, Distance, Gravity fields, Hostile/closed environments) and hold at least two contrasting Fermi Paradox resolutions against the evidence.
Common misconceptions
- 'Getting to Mars is just a longer trip to the Moon' — the distance, comms delay, radiation and duration make it a categorically harder, largely self-reliant mission
- 'Astronauts can be talked through any emergency from Earth' — up to a 20-minute one-way delay means crews must diagnose and act alone
- 'Weightlessness is harmless' — reduced gravity causes measurable bone and muscle loss and other physiological harm over months
- 'The Fermi Paradox has been solved' — it is an open problem with many competing, unproven resolutions
- 'No signal from SETI proves we are alone' — absence of detection so far is weak evidence given how little of the search space has been examined
- 'The Drake equation tells us how many aliens there are' — it is a framework for organising our uncertainty, and several of its factors are essentially unknown
Useful representations
- RIDGE hazard map: the five Mars-mission risks with a cause and a mitigation for each
- Mission trade-off matrix: options (crew size, shielding, supplies, transit time) versus constraints (mass, risk, cost)
- Fermi Paradox decision tree / Drake-equation-style factor chain from stars to detectable civilisations
- 'Great Filter' timeline: is the hard step behind us (life is rare) or ahead of us (civilisations self-destruct)?
- SETI methods diagram: radio/optical technosignature searches and what would count as a signal
Teaching practices
- Treat it as reasoning practice, not fact recall: the goal is to marshal evidence, weigh trade-offs, and defend a position on genuinely open questions
- Use NASA's RIDGE framework to give the Mars challenges a memorable, comprehensive structure rather than a random list
- Quantify the hazards where possible (20-minute comms delay, ~1-1.5%/month bone loss, ~140 million miles) so trade-offs feel real and force prioritisation
- For the Fermi Paradox, require students to hold TWO contrasting resolutions and evaluate each against evidence, rather than adopting one uncritically
- Distinguish clearly between what we know (mission engineering challenges, SETI methods), what we hypothesise (Great Filter, rare Earth), and what is speculation
- Connect the two halves: the difficulty of crossing even interstellar-tiny distances to Mars illuminates why contact across light-years might be so rare
Activities to try
- 1
Debate 'Where is everybody?' with an astrobiologist
Why it works: The Fermi Paradox is an open problem with many competing, unproven resolutions; your job is to build the strongest case you can and defend it against real counter-evidence, not to find an answer key.
- Respond to the opening provocation: 'The galaxy is ~13 billion years old and full of stars — so where is everybody?' by offering your own explanation for the silence.
- When you offer 'maybe they're too far away', answer the follow-up: then explain why not one probe, not one signal, in all that time.
- Name and argue at least TWO contrasting resolutions, e.g. (a) life/intelligence is extremely rare or a 'Great Filter' lies behind us, versus (b) civilisations are common but hard to detect or short-lived so we never overlap.
- Take a position on whether a Great Filter lies behind us, still ahead, or whether there may be no strong filter at all, and defend it against counter-evidence raised in the exchange (SETI's limited coverage of sky/frequencies/time, the vastness of distance).
- Relate the two halves of the topic: consider how the difficulty of crossing even the comparatively tiny distance to Mars illuminates why contact across light-years might be so rare — and weigh which is the harder problem, surviving the Mars journey or detecting life light-years away.
- 2
Prioritise the RIDGE hazards with a mission director
Why it works: A crewed Mars mission is a categorically harder, largely self-reliant problem than a lunar trip; the RIDGE hazards must be weighed and traded off, not solved all at once.
- Face the challenge: 'I can't shield the crew from every cosmic ray without grounding the rocket — so what do you protect, and what risk do you accept?'
- Work through NASA's five hazards (RIDGE): Radiation, Isolation and confinement, Distance from Earth, Gravity fields, Hostile/closed environments.
- For each hazard, state a cause, a quantified effect where possible, and a mitigation — e.g. galactic cosmic radiation is hard to shield and raises cancer/heart-disease/cataract risk (Earth's magnetosphere and atmosphere normally protect us); under the Gravity-fields hazard, reduced gravity causes BOTH weight-bearing bone mineral loss (~1-1.5% per month) AND muscle wasting, experienced across three different gravity environments (Earth gravity, microgravity in transit, and Mars gravity).
- Use the Distance figures — Mars is ~140 million miles away on average, with up to ~20-minute one-way comms delays — to explain why the crew must diagnose emergencies themselves and carry all supplies.
- Prioritise under conflicting constraints: decide what you protect first and what residual risk you accept, and justify the trade-off.
- 3
Build-a-Mars-mission trade-off sandbox
Why it works: The Mars hazards form a felt system of constraints you cannot all maximise at once; the Drake equation organises our uncertainty rather than telling us how many aliens there are.
- Allocate limited mass and budget across radiation shielding, food/water reserves, crew size and transit time.
- Watch a live dashboard recompute crew health risk, launch mass and mission-success odds as you move each control, and find the trade-offs that the numbers force.
- Open a Drake-equation explorer: set each factor yourself and watch the estimated number of contactable civilisations swing across orders of magnitude.
- Explain in words why small changes to uncertain factors cause huge swings, and connect this to why the 'are we alone' question stays open.
Science // Space Exploration
More in Space Exploration
- Where Elements Come FromAges 12 to 14ConceptExplain stellar nucleosynthesis: the Big Bang produced mainly hydrogen and helium; main-sequence fusion builds elements up to iron; and supernovae produce…
- Orbital MechanicsAges 12 to 13ConceptApply Newton's laws to explain orbital motion: why orbit is continuously falling sideways rather than floating; how a gravity assist (slingshot manoeuvre)…
- Finding ExoplanetsAges 11 to 13ConceptDescribe how astronomers detect planets around other stars using transit photometry (dip in starlight as a planet crosses) and radial velocity (Doppler wobble…
- Observing with Light WavesAges 11 to 13ConceptExplain how the electromagnetic spectrum is the primary tool of modern astronomy — different wavelengths (radio, infrared, visible, ultraviolet, X-ray…
- Why the Sun Looks BrightestAges 9 to 11ConceptExplain why the Sun appears much brighter than other stars: it is the nearest star to Earth, not the biggest or brightest star in the universe — understanding…
- Gravity Pulls Things DownAges 9 to 11ConceptUnderstand gravity as a force that pulls objects towards the centre of the Earth, that 'down' means towards Earth’s centre regardless of where you stand on the…
- Seasonal ConstellationsAges 9 to 11ConceptRecognise named constellations visible in different seasons and understand why we see different constellations at different times of year — because Earth’s…
- Changing Ideas About SpaceAges 9 to 11ConceptUnderstand that ideas about the solar system changed over time: ancient people believed Earth was at the centre (geocentric model, Ptolemy), until Copernicus…